Cultural Dimensions
EVALUATING
How Different Cultures Give Feedback and Evaluate Performance

Different cultures have different expectations when handling feedback, with some offering (and expecting) more direct negative feedback, while others are more indirect.
In China, managers learn never to criticize a colleague openly or in front of others, while the Dutch manager learns always to be honest and to give the message straight. Americans are trained to wrap positive messages around negative ones, while the French are trained to criticize openly and provide positive feedback sparingly.
One way to understand how a culture deals with negative feedback is by listening to the types of words people use. More direct cultures tend to use upgraders, words, such as absolutely, totally, or strongly: “This is absolutely inappropriate,” or “This is totally unprofessional.”
More indirect cultures use more downgrader, such as « sort, of slightly, etc » or, as the British, deliberate understatement.
The “Anglo-Dutch Translation Guide” below provides an illustration of this.

Key Characteristics
DIRECT NEGATIVE FEEDBACK |
INDIRECT NEGATIVE FEEDBACK |
|
|

COUNTRY COMPARISON
The chart shows examples of where certain countries fall on the communication scale.
In the following video, Erin Meyer talks about how different cultures give negative feedback.

THE LINK BETWEEN COMMUNICATION STYLE & THE WAY TO GIVE FEEDBACK
Evaluating is often confused with Communicating, but many countries have different positions on the two scales. The French, for example, are highcontext (implicit) communicators relative to Americans, yet they are more direct in their criticism. Spaniards and Mexicans are at the same context level, but the Spanish are more frank when providing negative feedback.
Source: Erin Meyer, The Culture Map
Get in Touch With Us
